@ArtificialAnlys evaluated Grok 4.7 (xhigh): Intelligence Index 46 (+2 vs 4.6), putting SpaceXAI in the top 4 labs. With Grok Build it scores 56 on the Coding Agent Index (+9 vs 4.6), 4th among native harnesses behind Claude Fable 5.1, GPT-6 Astra, and Claude Opus 5. Pricing stays $2/$6 per 1M in/out ($0.50 cache hits), 500k context.

Key Takeaways

  • ✓Coding Agent Index: Grok 4.7 + Grok Build scores 56 (+9), 4th among native harnesses.
  • ✓Intelligence Index 46 (+2) puts SpaceXAI in the top 4 labs; +111 Elo on AA-Briefcase.
  • ✓Same $2/$6 per 1M pricing as 4.6 ($0.50 cache hits), 500k context; gains come with higher token use.
Artificial Analysis: Grok 4.7 + Grok Build hits Coding Agent Index 56 (4th); Intelligence Index 46 puts SpaceXAI in top 4 labs
🖼️Official Media
Click to view high-res
⚡

Key Decision Metrics at a Glance

TL;DR Verdict
🏆 Benchmark RankRank
Coding Agent Index: Grok 4.7 + Grok Build scores 56 (+9), 4th among native harnesses.
Full Leaderboard→
💰 Cost & PlansCompare
Grok 4.7 · in: $2 / out: $6
Compare Plans↗
🛠️ Ecosystem & IDERules
Grok 4.7 · Artificial Analysis · Coding Agent Index
Setup IDE Rules↗
🧭

Turn your technical choice into a development budget

Compare 40 dev plans & simulate token costs vs $20/mo subscriptions

⚔️ Compare Model→💰 Compare plans & limits↗
Action HubReady to adopt this in production?

Benchmark side-by-side against alternatives, or calculate monthly token cost vs subscription break-even.

⚔️ Launch VS Compare→💳 View Plans↗
Up NextDevin Fusion with an Opus 5.5 lead and GPT-6 Luna sidekick tops the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index at 68.1, at what Cognition says is 31% lower cost per task than Claude Code with Opus 5.5
Read Now→